Harvey Weinstein’s Abnormal Testicles Are Key Focus of Final Arguments in Trial

Harvey Weinstein’s genitalia has steadily been addressed in open court docket all through his trial. However within the last hours of the case, the previous film mogul’s irregular testicles emerged as a key piece of proof on which the jury must deliberate after they decide whether or not he’s responsible of rape and sexual assault.

Through the trial, prosecutors revealed to the jury that Weinstein underwent surgical procedure in 1999 for Fournier’s Gangrene, which required medical doctors to take away a few of his scrotum. “That surgical procedure induced fairly noticeable scarring … Due to an an infection, his testicles have been really taken from his scrotum and put into his internal thighs,” the lead prosecutor, Deputy District Lawyer Paul Thompson, instructed the jury firstly of the trial.

Quite a few girls accusing Weinstein of rape and sexual assault have testified about his genitalia in the course of the prolonged trial. In October, the jury was proven pictures of Weinstein’s personal components, and sifted via an envelope of photographs in a personal room within the courthouse. Members of the general public and the media weren’t given entry to view the pictures.

Now, as deliberations have begun, the decision on three costs, all pertaining to Jane Doe #1, will largely depend on Weinstein’s genitalia. (Weinstein faces seven costs in complete.)

Jane Doe #1, a European actor and mannequin, has accused Weinstein of rape and sexual assault. She alleges the incident occurred in 2013 at Mr. C Beverly Hills Resort, the place she was staying when she attended the L.A. Italia Movie Pageant as a VIP visitor.

The protection has stated that the rape and sexual assault by no means occurred, claiming that she was by no means in a lodge room with Weinstein on the evening of the alleged incident.

On Friday, the largest focus of the prosecution’s last rebuttal was Jane Doe #1, whose allegations carry essentially the most costs — and a key component of the prosecutor’s argument was that Jane Doe #1 wouldn’t have been in a position to describe Weinstein’s genitalia had she not been sexually assaulted by him.

Throughout her testimony, Jane Doe #1 spoke at size about Weinstein’s testicles. On the stand, she tearfully instructed the jury that Weinstein demanded she “suck his balls,” or compelled her to carry out oral intercourse on him. Rehashing the graphic particulars, she stated, “He compelled me to do what he requested… I used to be crying, choking.” However throughout cross-examination, one in every of Weinstein’s attorneys, Alan Jackson, requested Jane Doe #1 how Weinstein’s “balls have been in your mouth,” if he doesn’t have testicles. “The explanation that you just modified your story is since you realized sooner or later that Mr. Weinstein doesn’t have testicles in his scrotum,” Jackson stated to Jane Doe #1 throughout her three-day testimony. She disagreed and stated she by no means modified her story, and at all times instructed detectives that Weinstein had irregular testicles. “I recall that he didn’t have one,” she stated. “It was like empty pores and skin.”

On Friday, Thompson addressed the jury. “You noticed these images … I’m positive if we requested you, it might be laborious to explain … It’s laborious to explain when you’re not a medical skilled.”

Thompson argued that whereas Jane Doe #1’s description might haven’t been completely correct, the one manner she would have any details about Weinstein’s testicles is that if she was sexually assaulted.

“Jane Doe #1 is ready to describe Mr. Weinstein’s anatomy,” Thompson stated. “She will do this as a result of he assaulted her. There’s no different rationalization for that.”

Jane Doe #1 will not be the one lady who described Weinstein’s genitalia in the course of the trial.

Jane Doe #2, who testified that Weinstein groped her and masturbated in entrance of her in 2013 stated, “His penis was disgusting. It appeared prefer it had been chopped off and sewn again on, like one thing wasn’t proper about it.”

Jane Doe #4, Jennifer Siebel Newsom, stated, “I simply bear in mind being shocked by every thing.” The First Associate of California, who’s married to Gov. Gavin Newsom, has accused Weinstein of raping her in 2005 when she was an up-and-coming actor and filmmaker. She described Weinstein’s physique as having, “A lot of bruises, markings, yellow and inexperienced, plenty of stretch marks on his stomach, very not bodily match in any respect.” She stated his penis seemed to be “sort of fish-like,” and described “one thing was distorted within the testicles … A lot of pores and skin, plenty of pores and skin down there.”

Pertaining to Jane Doe #1, Weinstein’s attorneys say she was by no means within the lodge room as a result of a fireplace alarm went off within the lodge across the time of the alleged assault, however Jane Doe #1 by no means heard the alarm. Prosecutors rebutted that it’s potential that she didn’t hear the fireplace alarm in her room, or that the alarm might have gone off earlier than she had returned to the lodge that evening, after attending the movie pageant the place she briefly met Weinstein. Through the protection’s closing arguments, Weinstein’s legal professional, Jackson, alleged that Jane Doe #1 was really within the lodge room of the pageant organizer, Pascal Vicedomini, with whom, Jackson claimed, she was having a sexual relationship. 

In response to that accusation, Thompson introduced up emails between Weinstein and Vicedomini as proof for the jury. In a single electronic mail, Vicedomini wrote to Weinstein, “You’re my hero and my greatest good friend within the business … I might at all times deceive please you.”

Moreover, the prosecutor introduced up extra emails and paperwork between Weinstein and numerous employees members and mates, in an effort to showcase Weinstein’s shut relationships and the ability he held in social circles {and professional} areas. One electronic mail between Weinstein and Giuseppe Cipriani, the proprietor of Mr. C Resort, confirmed Weinstein writing, “You guys have been superb to me,” referencing the employees on the lodge the place Jane Doe #1 alleges she was raped. At one other occasion, Thompson famous that Weinstein’s former driver who testified within the trial admitted on the stand that Weinstein was paying for his legal professional.


Related Articles


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Stay Connected

- Advertisement -spot_img